Free .md file delivered to your inbox
We've sent the Content Coverage Analyzer .md file with full setup instructions for Claude.
The same structured methodology LeadWalnut uses to audit content coverage for enterprise B2B SaaS clients. Here's what runs across the audit.
Four-pass URL extraction so nothing slips. Then identifies the 8–15 sub-categories that actually matter to the business.
Every URL is mapped to a sub-category, classified by funnel stage and content type, and scored for coverage depth and gap severity.
Every gap is turned into a specific action — either fixing an existing page or creating a new one. No vague "we need more content."
No coding required. No complex setup. Just follow the process.
Enter your details above. We'll email you the .md skill file.
Upload the .md file to Claude.ai or Claude Desktop. No MCP integration required.
Website URL, category name, primary and secondary competitors. Supporting docs welcome.
Receive a single self-contained HTML report ready to share with leadership.
The skill is built for Anthropic's Claude and depends on its long-context reasoning to inventory hundreds of URLs and produce a fully formatted HTML report in a single audit. Running it elsewhere will produce truncated URL coverage, broken classification, and inconsistent funnel mapping.
Here's how the LeadWalnut Coverage Analyzer compares to the manual, page-counting audits most teams run today.
| Dimension | Manual / Gut-Feel Audits | LeadWalnut Coverage Analyzer |
|---|---|---|
| Methodology | ×Page count and keyword spreadsheets | ✓9-phase structured audit pipeline |
| URL Coverage | ×Single sitemap pull — pages missed | ✓4-pass extraction (sitemap + pattern + header + hub) |
| Classification | ×Loose tags, no consistent framework | ✓Funnel stage + content type per page from a fixed framework |
| Gap Severity | ×"We need more content" — unscored | ✓Critical / Moderate / Minor, weighted by sub-category |
| Competitive Benchmark | ×Domain rating comparison — surface-level | ✓Per sub-category coverage % vs dominant competitor |
| Output | ×Slide deck nobody reads | ✓Self-contained HTML report — scannable in 5 minutes |
A B2B remote access SaaS competing against Action1, NinjaOne and Kaseya in the Patch Management category. Here's what the audit surfaced.
Client name anonymised. All numbers from a live audit run April 2026.
Teams responsible for content coverage, topical authority, and AI search visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Gemini — and traditional SERPs.
Get the skill. Run a 9-phase audit. See exactly what's missing before you create a single page.
Download MD File →